OwlSheets
Verbals Behind the Robotics Results worksheet preview

WorksheetPremium

Verbals Behind the Robotics Results

Analyze gerunds, participles, and infinitives in a school robotics news report, then explain how their sentence roles differ.

Grade 8ELAInteractive · Printable

Aligned toL.8.1.a

Buy this worksheet: $1.50

Or unlock every Premium worksheet with Premium

PrintUnlock to print
Answer keyUnlock to see answers
Assign to classUnlock to assign with a class code

What’s included

  • Single worksheet
  • Auto-graded online
  • 1 Common Core standard
  • Printable answer key
  • 14 questions
  • Classroom-ready

Details

Format
Interactive · Printable
Grade
Grade 8
Subject
ELA
Question types
Fill in the blank, Multiple choice, Circle the answer, Short answer

About this worksheet

What students practice

  • Students explain the general functions of gerunds, participles, and infinitives.
  • Students identify the specific noun, adjective, or adverb role of a verbal phrase in context.
  • Students distinguish verbals from verb phrases that serve as sentence predicates.

How to use

Have students read the report and mark verb forms before answering. Discuss how sentence function, rather than a word’s ending alone, determines its role.

Curriculum

Common Core standard covered

L.8.1.a

Explain what gerunds, participles, and infinitives do in general and in particular sentences.

Preview

OwlSheets.com

Name Date

Verbals Behind the Robotics Results

Explain how verb forms work as nouns, adjectives, and adverbs in a school news report.

Read and Analyze

Read the school news report. For each grammar question, consider what the entire quoted phrase does in its sentence.

Robotics Team Takes Second, Earns Design Recognition

1Westfield Middle School’s robotics team finished second at Saturday’s regional competition, but the final standings tell only part of the story. Teams programmed small machines to move foam blocks into marked zones without touching the machines during a run. Westfield arrived with a fast design that had performed well in practice. On the competition surface, however, its robot repeatedly pushed blocks beyond the scoring area.

2The team had one practice period before the scored rounds. Students gathered beside the testing table. Captain Leena Voss set the original speed chart on a chair. She invited every teammate to propose a change before choosing the team’s adjustment. The students then returned to their assigned stations. Their coach watched from behind the boundary line.

3The team’s strongest habit was checking each adjustment against its notes. Rather than guessing, students compared the robot’s stopping points across several trials. A bent bracket near one wheel drew their attention, but replacing it did not solve the problem. The next step was to reduce the approach speed. Leena agreed to test the slower program while teammate Dae Kim recorded the results.

4A flashing indicator warned the students when each trial began. The robot was carrying a foam block when its left wheel slipped near a taped seam. Dae pointed to a setting to change before the next run. With a smaller turn and a slower approach, the machine placed the block inside the zone. The team saved both versions of the program instead of deleting the unsuccessful one.

5During the scored rounds, Westfield completed fewer trips than the winning team but misplaced fewer blocks than it had during practice. Students studying the score display noticed that reliable placement had narrowed the gap. The judges praised the team for documenting its decisions. In their review, they asked students to explain one unsuccessful trial as carefully as the successful final run. The students used their saved notes to answer.

6After the awards, Leena described the result for the school news staff. She credited the group’s willingness to reconsider a popular design, not one dramatic repair. The team plans to prepare a demonstration for next month’s club meeting. Its goal is to show younger members how one recorded mistake can guide the next test. The second-place certificate will sit beside the notebook used throughout the competition.

1.
Which conclusion about Leena’s approach to making the adjustment is best supported by paragraph 2?
  • A. She made room for teammates’ ideas before reaching a decision.
  • B. She treated the original speed chart as the final authority.
  • C. She relied on the coach to select the team’s next change.
  • D. She assigned each teammate a different adjustment to complete.
2.
Underline the sentence from paragraph 2 that specifically shows Leena seeking input from the whole team before deciding.

The team had one practice period before the scored rounds.Students gathered beside the testing table.Captain Leena Voss set the original speed chart on a chair.She invited every teammate to propose a change before choosing the team’s adjustment.The students then returned to their assigned stations.Their coach watched from behind the boundary line.

The preview shows the first questions. Unlock the worksheet to see all of it.

Related worksheets