OwlSheets
Spots on the Sun: Galileo and Scheiner Disagree worksheet preview

Worksheet

Spots on the Sun: Galileo and Scheiner Disagree

Grade 7 history: compare Scheiner's and Galileo's printed letters on sunspots, check them against a spot's path, and link printing and Renaissance art to the debate.

Grade 7Social StudiesInteractive · Printable

Aligned toHIS.7.7

What’s included

  • Single worksheet
  • Auto-graded online
  • 1 C3 Framework standard
  • Printable answer key
  • 11 questions
  • Classroom-ready

Details

Format
Interactive · Printable
Grade
Grade 7
Subject
Social Studies
Question types
Fill in the blank, Multiple choice, Circle the answer, Sorting, Short answer

About this worksheet

What students practice

  • Students compare and corroborate two accounts from the Scientific Revolution using observational data.
  • Students explain how the printing press and Renaissance art skills shaped the sunspot debate.

How to use

Read the background together, then have partners sort the claims in the two letters before checking them against the table on their own.

Curriculum

C3 Framework standard covered

HIS.7.7

Describe the Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution, including the printing press, new art and Galileo's observations.

Preview

OwlSheets.com

Name Date

Spots on the Sun: Galileo and Scheiner Disagree

Corroborate two printed letters from 1612 with a record of one sunspot's path.

Background: a quarrel in print

Read the passage. Then answer the questions.

Spots, Letters and Presses, 1610–1613

1By 1600, the Renaissance had spread from the city-states of Italy across Europe. Scholars studied ancient Greek and Roman books, and printing presses in hundreds of towns turned out copies of old and new works. Many scholars still accepted Aristotle's ancient teaching that the heavens were perfect and never changed.

2In 1609 and 1610, Galileo Galilei of Italy turned a telescope to the sky. Within a year or two, he and several other observers noticed dark spots on the face of the Sun. Looking straight at the Sun can blind a person, so Galileo's student Benedetto Castelli found a safer way: he let the telescope throw the Sun's image onto a sheet of paper, where an observer could trace the spots day after day.

3Christoph Scheiner, a Jesuit priest who taught mathematics at the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, watched the spots too. He described them in three letters in Latin, the language of European scholars, to Mark Welser, a banker and scholar in Augsburg. Welser had the letters printed in January 1612. Scheiner's superiors asked him not to use his own name, so he signed as "Apelles hiding behind the picture," after a painter of ancient Greece who was said to hide behind his paintings to hear what viewers said.

4Galileo read the printed letters and answered with three letters of his own to Welser. In 1613 the Lincean Academy, a society of scientists in Rome, printed them as a book. Galileo wrote in Italian, not Latin, so merchants, artists and other readers who had never studied Latin could follow his argument.

5Art played a part as well. Galileo had studied drawing in Florence, and in 1610 he used the shading of light and shadow that Renaissance painters had mastered to show mountains and craters on the Moon. His friend, the painter Lodovico Cigoli, painted a Moon with craters beneath the feet of the Virgin Mary in the dome of a chapel in Rome, finished in 1612.

6The quarrel did not end quickly. Scheiner kept watching the Sun for years. In a long book on sunspots published in 1630, he placed the spots on the Sun itself.

1.
Use paragraphs 3 and 4. Why did Galileo most likely write his letters in Italian?
  • A. Welser could not read letters written in Latin.
  • B. Scholars in 1612 had stopped writing in Latin.
  • C. Printers in Rome had no type for Latin books.
  • D. He hoped to reach readers beyond Latin scholars.
2.
Sort each detail from the passage by the change it mainly shows.
A cratered Moon painted in a chapel domeWelser has Scheiner's letters set in typeThe Sun's image thrown onto a sheet of paperThe Lincean Academy issues Galileo's letters as a bookPainters' skill at shading light and shadowTracing a spot's position day after day
New artThe printing pressNew ways of observing
3.
How did the printing press most likely shape the sunspot quarrel?
  • A. Observers in different cities could read and answer each other in months.
  • B. Printers decided which of the two observers was telling the truth.
  • C. Printed books settled the question in Scheiner's favor by 1613.
  • D. Printed pictures let readers see sunspots without using a telescope.

Two accounts that disagree

Read both adapted accounts and their source notes. Then answer the questions.

Account A: Adapted from Scheiner's letters to Welser, printed in Augsburg, 1612

Source note: Scheiner wrote these letters in Latin under a false name. They were printed in January 1612, before Galileo's answer.

For several months I have watched dark spots on the Sun through a telescope fitted with colored glass. At first I suspected a flaw in my lens or my eye, but the spots appeared through different telescopes and were seen by other observers. They cross the Sun from one edge to the other in about two weeks.

I cannot believe the spots are on the Sun itself. The Sun is the brightest and purest of all bodies, and it is hard to accept that it carries dark stains. Also, if the spots were fixed to a turning Sun, the same spots would come back into view about two weeks after they left, yet I have not seen them return. I judge that the dark spots are small bodies, perhaps stars, that circle the Sun as Venus and Mercury do. We see them only when they pass in front of it.

Account B: Adapted from Galileo's letters to Welser, printed in Rome, 1613

Source note: Galileo wrote these letters in Italian in 1612, after reading Scheiner's printed letters.

The dark spots on the Sun are not stars. Stars keep their shapes, but these spots appear and vanish, grow and shrink, and join together and break apart, much like clouds. Some last only a day or two, others a month or more.

Using my student Castelli's method of throwing the Sun's image onto paper, I traced the spots day after day. Near the edge of the Sun the spots look thin and move slowly; near the middle they look wide and move faster. This is just what we would see of marks on a turning ball. So the spots are on the Sun's surface or very close to it, and the Sun turns about once a month. That the same spots do not return is no surprise, since they change and dissolve. Those who say the heavens never change must give up that belief.

4.
Use only the two accounts. Sort each statement: does it appear in both accounts, only in Account A, or only in Account B?
Dark spots can be seen on the Sun.The spots grow, shrink and break apart.The spots are small bodies circling the Sun.The same spots do not return into view.The spots were seen through different telescopes.The spots look thin near the Sun's edge.
Both accountsOnly Account AOnly Account B
5.
Which reason in Account A rests on a belief about the heavens rather than on something Scheiner observed?
  • A. The same spots were not seen coming back.
  • B. The spots showed up through different telescopes.
  • C. The Sun is too pure to carry dark stains.
  • D. The spots crossed the Sun in about two weeks.
6.
Circle the sentence in Account B that answers Scheiner's point about spots coming back into view.

This is just what we would see of marks on a turning ball.So the spots are on the Sun's surface or very close to it, and the Sun turns about once a month.That the same spots do not return is no surprise, since they change and dissolve.Those who say the heavens never change must give up that belief.

7.
Account B was written after Galileo had read Account A. How does this affect Account B as a source?
  • A. Galileo could aim his arguments at Scheiner's points.
  • B. It was printed in Latin for the same readers as Account A.
  • C. It shows what Scheiner came to believe by 1630.
  • D. Galileo had not yet looked at the Sun himself.

Check the accounts against a record

The table shows a simplified record of one sunspot crossing the Sun's image on paper, in made-up units. Distance is measured from the edge where the spot first appeared (0) to the far edge (100). Use it with the accounts.

One Sunspot's Path Across the Sun (simplified, made-up units)
DayDistance from edgeWidth of spot
123
3157
53710
76310
9857
11983
8.

Use the table. Write each number. The spot moved   units between day 1 and day 3, and   units between day 5 and day 7.

9.
Which pattern in the table best corroborates Galileo's account?
  • A. The spot moves fastest near the edges and slows down in the middle.
  • B. The spot looks thin and moves slowly near both edges, and wide and fast in the middle.
  • C. The spot grows wider each day until it leaves the far edge of the Sun.
  • D. The spot moves the same distance in each two days from edge to edge.
10.
Paragraph 6 says Scheiner later placed the spots on the Sun itself. What does this change best show about the Scientific Revolution?
  • A. Ancient books gave the final answer on questions about the sky.
  • B. Years of careful watching could change an expert's view.
  • C. Scholars stopped arguing about the heavens after 1613.
  • D. Scholars accepted new ideas as soon as they were printed.
11.
Which account was better supported by evidence, Scheiner's or Galileo's? Make a claim, use evidence from both accounts and the table, and explain your reasoning.

Related worksheets