OwlSheets
Who Belongs in the Railroad Story? worksheet preview

Worksheet

Who Belongs in the Railroad Story?

Analyze an original article about the first transcontinental railroad, focusing on author perspective and competing historical interpretations.

Grade 7ELAInteractive · Printable

Aligned toRI.7.6

What’s included

  • Single worksheet
  • Auto-graded online
  • 1 Common Core standard
  • Printable answer key
  • 13 questions
  • Classroom-ready

Details

Format
Interactive · Printable
Grade
Grade 7
Subject
ELA
Question types
Multiple choice, Circle the answer, Short answer

About this worksheet

What students practice

  • Students identify an author's perspective on how the first transcontinental railroad should be remembered.
  • Students analyze how word choice and historical details distinguish an author's position from other views.
  • Students select evidence that supports an interpretation of an author's purpose.

How to use

Have students read and annotate the article independently. Use the evidence pairs to discuss how an author can accept historical facts while challenging the way those facts are presented.

Curriculum

Common Core standard covered

RI.7.6

Identify an author's point of view or purpose and how the author sets that position apart from others.

Preview

OwlSheets.com

Name Date

Who Belongs in the Railroad Story?

Analyze how an author challenges familiar ways of telling history.

Read the article

Notice the difference between historical facts and the author's judgments about how those facts should be presented.

Who Belongs in the Railroad Story?

1A polished spike makes a convenient symbol. In 1869, the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads met at Promontory Summit in Utah Territory, completing the first transcontinental railroad. Ceremonial spikes marked the occasion. A history display can arrange the story around that meeting: two lines approach, a final gap closes, and the nation celebrates. The ending is clear. The work that made it possible is less easily fitted into a display case.

2One familiar account emphasizes machines. Locomotives, rails, and tunnels demonstrate the power of nineteenth-century engineering. That account contains important facts: the railroad made long-distance travel faster and helped goods move across the continent. Yet a locomotive cannot explain who prepared its path. When equipment becomes the main character, people can begin to look like accessories to their own achievement.

3Consider the crews who built the western portion. Chinese immigrants made up a large share of the Central Pacific workforce, while workers from many backgrounds, including Irish immigrants, helped build the Union Pacific. Crews graded ground, laid track, and cut tunnels through difficult terrain. Snow and steep mountain slopes complicated the work. Listing a company's name above a finished route tells readers who operated the railroad, but not whose effort produced it.

4A second familiar account treats the completed line as something that was bound to happen. On a modern map, its route may look settled and obvious. Construction, however, required people to solve problems that the map no longer shows. A tunnel is not merely a line through a mountain; it is evidence of work that could not be skipped. Calling the railroad inevitable turns decisions and persistence into background scenery.

5A short display cannot name every worker or explain every engineering problem. That practical limit deserves attention, but it need not determine the whole story. A photograph of a crew beside a tool can make labor visible without requiring a wall of text. A caption can explain what the crew did rather than simply identify the railroad company. Brevity requires selection; it does not require choosing only the most powerful people.

6Keep the ceremonial spike. Its importance is real, and the meeting at Promontory Summit belongs in the account. But place evidence of construction beside it, where visitors must encounter both. The spike marks the moment a connection was celebrated. A worn tool asks visitors to think about how that connection was made.

Identify the perspective

Choose the best answer. In each evidence question, look for support for the specific interpretation, not just a true historical detail.

1.
What tension does the author establish in paragraph 1?
  • A. The companies agreed on a route, but they disagreed about holding a celebration.
  • B. The ceremony's location is certain, but its date remains difficult to establish.
  • C. The railroad's equipment is well preserved, but its ceremonial objects have disappeared.
  • D. The completed connection is easy to display, but the building process is harder to represent.
2.
Which pair of sentences from paragraph 1 best supports the answer to question 1?
  • A. “The ending is clear.” / “The work that made it possible is less easily fitted into a display case.”
  • B. “A polished spike makes a convenient symbol.” / “The ending is clear.”
  • C. “Ceremonial spikes marked the occasion.” / “The ending is clear.”
  • D. “A polished spike makes a convenient symbol.” / “Ceremonial spikes marked the occasion.”
3.
In paragraph 2, how does the phrase “accessories to their own achievement” reveal the author's point of view?
  • A. It criticizes accounts that make workers seem less important than the equipment they used.
  • B. It questions whether railroad workers understood how their equipment functioned.
  • C. It praises accounts that explain workers' achievements through descriptions of their tools.
  • D. It suggests that railroad workers preferred machines to receive public attention.
4.
Which sentence from paragraph 2 most directly supports the interpretation in question 3?
  • A. “Locomotives, rails, and tunnels demonstrate the power of nineteenth-century engineering.”
  • B. “When equipment becomes the main character, people can begin to look like accessories to their own achievement.”
  • C. “That account contains important facts: the railroad made long-distance travel faster and helped goods move across the continent.”
  • D. “One familiar account emphasizes machines.”
5.
Why does the author name immigrant groups and describe construction tasks in paragraph 3?
  • A. To rank the two railroad companies according to the difficulty of their routes.
  • B. To supply the human contributions that a company-centered account can leave out.
  • C. To argue that company records provide a complete account of railroad construction.
  • D. To explain why the workers chose particular railroad companies as employers.
6.
Underline the ONE sentence from paragraph 3 that explicitly contrasts identifying a company with recognizing the people who built its route.

Consider the crews who built the western portion.Chinese immigrants made up a large share of the Central Pacific workforce, while workers from many backgrounds, including Irish immigrants, helped build the Union Pacific.Crews graded ground, laid track, and cut tunnels through difficult terrain.Snow and steep mountain slopes complicated the work.Listing a company's name above a finished route tells readers who operated the railroad, but not whose effort produced it.

Analyze the distinctions

Examine how the author challenges other interpretations and proposes a different way to present the history.

7.
How does the author's interpretation of a completed route differ from the “bound to happen” account in paragraph 4?
  • A. The author treats the route as evidence that maps were more useful than construction tools.
  • B. The author sees the route as proof that the companies avoided serious construction problems.
  • C. The author sees the route as the result of choices and effort hidden by its finished appearance.
  • D. The author treats the route as evidence that construction followed an obvious path.
8.
Which pair of details from paragraph 4 best supports the answer to question 7?
  • A. A modern map makes the route look obvious; calling it inevitable hides decisions and persistence.
  • B. The route appears on a modern map; a tunnel passes through a mountain.
  • C. A second familiar account concerns the completed line; the author mentions a modern map.
  • D. The author describes a familiar account; the paragraph compares a tunnel with a line.
9.
What distinction does the author make in paragraph 5 about limited display space?
  • A. Limited space makes photographs more accurate sources than written explanations.
  • B. Limited space requires choices, but those choices can still make workers visible.
  • C. Limited space requires replacing engineering information with lists of workers' names.
  • D. Limited space makes it necessary to describe companies before describing workers.
10.
Underline the ONE sentence from paragraph 5 that most directly rejects the idea that short displays must focus on powerful people.

A short display cannot name every worker or explain every engineering problem.That practical limit deserves attention, but it need not determine the whole story.A photograph of a crew beside a tool can make labor visible without requiring a wall of text.A caption can explain what the crew did rather than simply identify the railroad company.Brevity requires selection; it does not require choosing only the most powerful people.

11.
Which proposed display would best carry out the author's purpose in paragraph 6?
  • A. A ceremonial spike beside a map tracing the railroads and identifying their company leaders.
  • B. A ceremonial spike beside a locomotive model explaining the benefits of faster transportation.
  • C. A construction tool beside a caption explaining why the completion ceremony deserves little attention.
  • D. A ceremonial spike beside a construction tool and a caption explaining the labor it represents.
12.
Which pair of sentences from paragraph 6 best supports the display choice in question 11?
  • A. “Keep the ceremonial spike.” / “The spike marks the moment a connection was celebrated.”
  • B. “The spike marks the moment a connection was celebrated.” / “A worn tool asks visitors to think about how that connection was made.”
  • C. “Keep the ceremonial spike.” / “But place evidence of construction beside it, where visitors must encounter both.”
  • D. “Its importance is real, and the meeting at Promontory Summit belongs in the account.” / “The spike marks the moment a connection was celebrated.”
13.
A proposed exhibit heading reads, “Machines Made the Connection Inevitable.” Write a replacement heading that reflects the article's perspective. Then explain how your heading challenges BOTH the machine-centered account and the “bound to happen” account. Use details from at least two paragraphs.

Related worksheets