WorksheetPremium
Flood Planning for Lake Junction Clinic
Compare flood-protection designs for a lakeside clinic using model results, costs, neighboring impacts, and stronger-flood tests.
Grade 4ScienceInteractive · Printable
Aligned to4-ESS3-2
Or unlock every Premium worksheet with Premium
What’s included
- Single worksheet
- Auto-graded online
- 1 NGSS standard
- Printable answer key
- 14 questions
- Classroom-ready
Details
- Format
- Interactive · Printable
- Grade
- Grade 4
- Subject
- Science
- Question types
- Fill in the blank, Multiple choice, Circle the answer, Sorting, Short answer
About this worksheet
What students practice
- Students compare flood-protection designs using results for a clinic and nearby yards.
- Students evaluate designs using cost limits, protection goals, and different flood conditions.
- Students support a design recommendation with evidence and explain a limit of model tests.
How to use
Read the planning report together. Have students compare both graphs before choosing designs, then use the additional tests to revise their recommendations.
Curriculum
NGSS standard covered
Compare solutions that reduce the effects of natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods and volcanoes on people.
Preview
OwlSheets.com
Flood Planning for Lake Junction Clinic
Compare flood designs, weigh trade-offs, and recommend a safer plan.
1. Compare Effects in Two Places
Read the report and both graphs. Less water means less flooding in the measured area. Model cost points are not real construction prices.
A Clinic Where the River Meets the Lake
Lake Junction Clinic stands on low ground where a river enters a lake. After long periods of heavy rain, rising water can reach the clinic and nearby homes. Floodwater could damage medical supplies and make the clinic difficult to use. Local planners want to compare ways to reduce these effects without sending more water toward the homes.
A science club built a model of the area in a large tray. A small container represented a room in the clinic. Another marked area represented neighboring yards. The students compared four designs. “No change” left the model as it was. An entry wall stood in front of the clinic. A side channel guided water around both marked areas toward a collecting basin. A raised floor lifted the model clinic room on short supports.
For each design, students poured one liter of room-temperature water into the river end of the tray over thirty seconds. They kept the tray slope, model ground, starting water level, and pouring place the same. They emptied and reset the tray between tests. Only the protection design changed. After each pour, they measured water collected inside the model clinic and in the neighboring-yard area. The two graphs show the results of this first test in milliliters, or mL.
The designs also had model costs: no change cost 0 points, the entry wall cost 3 points, the side channel cost 5 points, and the raised floor cost 8 points. The first planning goal was to keep clinic water at 80 mL or less and yard water at 120 mL or less while spending no more than 5 points.
The tray cannot copy every real flood. Full-size designs would need trained planners to study local land and water conditions. Clinic workers and patients must still follow official flood warnings and leave when directed.
The preview shows the first questions. Unlock the worksheet to see all of it.
Related worksheets
WorksheetGrade 4
Hazard Choices on the City Bridge Walkway
Earth & Space Science · 4-ESS3-2
Premium15 questions
WorksheetGrade 4
Flood-Smart Bike Repair Stations
Earth & Space Science · 4-ESS3-2
Premium14 questions
WorksheetGrade 4
Safer Spaces at the Community Bike Shop
Earth & Space Science · 4-ESS3-2
Premium14 questions
WorksheetGrade 4
Two Gates, Different Flood Solutions
Earth & Space Science · 4-ESS3-2
Premium14 questions
WorksheetGrade 4
A Safer Way from the Rainforest Weaving Hall
Earth & Space Science · 4-ESS3-2
Premium14 questions
WorksheetGrade 4
The Classroom Shake-Platform Challenge
Earth & Space Science · 4-ESS3-2
Free13 questions