OwlSheets
Competition Report: Reading Beyond the Score worksheet preview

WorksheetPremium

Competition Report: Reading Beyond the Score

Interpret vocabulary in a school robotics report using contrasts, examples, sentence structure, and surrounding details.

Grade 8ELAInteractive · Printable

Aligned toL.8.4.a

Buy this worksheet: $1.50

Or unlock every Premium worksheet with Premium

PrintUnlock to print
Answer keyUnlock to see answers
Assign to classUnlock to assign with a class code

What’s included

  • Single worksheet
  • Auto-graded online
  • 1 Common Core standard
  • Printable answer key
  • 13 questions
  • Classroom-ready

Details

Format
Interactive · Printable
Grade
Grade 8
Subject
ELA
Question types
Multiple choice, Matching, Circle the answer, Short answer

About this worksheet

What students practice

  • Students infer word meanings from examples, contrasts, and explanations in a school news report.
  • Students use a word's position and grammatical function to distinguish possible meanings.
  • Students justify vocabulary interpretations with specific contextual evidence.

How to use

Read the report independently, then complete the context-clue tasks without a dictionary. Discuss how sentence structure helps rule out tempting definitions.

Curriculum

Common Core standard covered

L.8.4.a

Use context, such as the meaning of the whole sentence or a word's position or function, as a clue to what a word means.

Preview

OwlSheets.com

Name Date

Competition Report: Reading Beyond the Score

Use sentence meaning and word function to interpret vocabulary in a school news report.

Read and infer

Read the original school news report. Use the surrounding language rather than a familiar definition alone.

One Berth, Several Lessons

1Westhaven Middle School earned a berth in the regional robotics final Saturday after finishing second in a qualifying round. The result secured the team a place among the finalists, not a trophy. Student competitors had programmed machines to move wooden blocks into marked zones. Between rounds, they could adjust their programs, but each machine had to complete its scored run without anyone touching it.

2During practice, Westhaven’s machine followed an erratic route. It veered left on one attempt, swung right on the next, and crossed the center line on the third. Teammates Lenka and Dario watched from behind a low barrier. A yellow indicator glowed above the starting square. Dario recorded each run on a tablet while Lenka compared the movements with their program.

3A loose wheel connection turned out to be responsible. Tightening the connection arrested the wobble; the machine’s side-to-side shaking stopped before the next trial ended. The team then took a methodical approach to testing, changing one setting, recording the result, and only then changing another. Their compact machine fit inside a storage crate beside the table. Other teams were already lining up for the next round.

4In the final qualifying run, Westhaven finished with a margin of two points over the next team. That small gap prompted close scrutiny of the score sheet: officials checked each entry against the recorded results. A block resting across a boundary had received no points. Lenka submitted an appeal, asking officials to review that decision rather than accepting the original ruling. After checking the overhead recording, officials left the score unchanged.

5The team’s improvement was modest: its machine delivered just one more block than in the previous round. Yet that additional delivery was enough to secure second place. “We were tempted to chase speed,” Dario said. “Instead, we made the movements repeatable.” Their coach described the result as a measured success, offering restrained praise rather than declaring the machine unbeatable. The team would need further testing before the regional final.

6During cleanup, students had to yield the practice table to another school, so they moved their equipment and let the waiting team take its turn. Lenka packed the tools while Dario saved the run records. Those records would guide the next practice session. The team left with an invitation to the final and a list of problems that its qualifying score had not erased.

1.
In paragraph 2, which meaning of erratic best describes the machine’s route?
  • A. Carefully planned to avoid obstacles
  • B. Unpredictable from attempt to attempt
  • C. Consistently slower than other routes
  • D. Indirect but successful each time
2.
Underline the sentence from paragraph 2 that shows how the machine’s direction varied between attempts.

It veered left on one attempt, swung right on the next, and crossed the center line on the third.Teammates Lenka and Dario watched from behind a low barrier.A yellow indicator glowed above the starting square.Dario recorded each run on a tablet while Lenka compared the movements with their program.

The preview shows the first questions. Unlock the worksheet to see all of it.

Related worksheets