OwlSheets
← Exit

Silenced Petitions: The Gag Rule and Angelina Grimké, 1836–1844

0 / 11

Silenced Petitions: The Gag Rule and Angelina Grimké, 1836–1844

Source a speech about the right to petition and trace how a House rule differs from a law.

Petitions and the gag rule

Read the passage. Then answer the questions.

A Rule Against Reading Petitions

1A bill becomes a law by a long road. A member of Congress introduces it, a committee studies it, and both the House and the Senate must pass the same version. The President then signs it or vetoes it, and Congress can override a veto with a two-thirds vote in each house. The Constitution also says that "each House may determine the rules of its proceedings." A rule like this needs only a vote of that one chamber, and it governs how the chamber works rather than what citizens must do.

2The First Amendment protects the right of the people "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." In the 1830s, antislavery societies gathered signatures on petitions asking Congress to end slavery and the slave trade in the District of Columbia, which Congress governed. Historians estimate the petitions carried hundreds of thousands of signatures. Members of Congress usually presented the petitions sent from their own districts, so petitioning was also a way to contact officials directly. Many signers were women. In 1838 no state let women vote or serve on juries.

3In May 1836 the House adopted a rule that every petition about slavery would be "laid on the table," or set aside without being printed or debated. Many Southern members said Congress had no power over slavery and that the petitions insulted their states. Some Northern members also voted for the rule to keep the issue from dividing their party. The House renewed the rule each session, and in 1840 it made a standing rule, Rule 21, refusing even to receive such petitions. Supporters of the rule also said the flood of petitions wasted the House's time. Opponents called it the gag rule.

4John Quincy Adams, a former President, had been elected to the House by Massachusetts voters in 1830. He argued that the gag rule violated the First Amendment, and he kept presenting petitions from citizens. Many Northern voters came to see the rule as an attack on their own rights as well as on enslaved people. In 1842 some members tried to censure him, but the effort failed after days of debate, and his district kept re-electing him. On December 3, 1844, the House voted 108 to 80 to end the gag rule.

1.
Use paragraphs 1 and 3. Why did the gag rule not need a Senate vote or the President's signature?
Question 1 options
2.
Sort each step. Is it part of a bill becoming a law, or part of one chamber setting its own rules?
3.
Use paragraph 2. Why would the gag rule matter especially to many of the women who signed petitions?
Question 3 options
4.
Use paragraph 4. What does Adams's re-election after the 1842 censure attempt show about how citizens take part?
Question 4 options
5.

Use paragraphs 3 and 4. Write each number. Subtract the year the House first adopted the gag rule from the year it ended: the gag rule lasted about years. The vote to end it passed by votes.

Source a speech

Read the source note first, then the adapted excerpt. Then answer the questions.

Source note: Angelina Grimké was born in 1805 in Charleston, South Carolina, to a family that held enslaved people. She moved north, became a Quaker and spoke against slavery. On February 21, 1838, she spoke to a committee of the Massachusetts legislature about antislavery petitions that about 20,000 Massachusetts women had signed. She is believed to be the first woman to speak to an American legislative body. Her speech survives mainly through newspaper reports.

Adapted from Angelina Grimké's speech to the Massachusetts legislature, 1838

1I stand before you on behalf of the 20,000 women of Massachusetts whose names are on the petitions before you. These petitions deal with slavery, a political subject, and it has often been said that women have nothing to do with politics.

2Are we strangers in our own country because we are women? Do we lose our citizenship because we are the mothers, wives and daughters of a mighty people? The right of petition is the only political right women have. Let it not be taken from us.

3I do not speak of slavery from books alone. I was born and raised in the South, and I have seen it with my own eyes. I ask you to hear these petitions and to act on them.

6.
Why does the source note's detail about Grimké's birthplace matter when judging her speech?
Question 6 options
7.
The speech survives mainly through newspaper reports. What is one limit this creates for historians?
Question 7 options
8.
Circle the sentence in paragraph 2 that explains why losing petitions would leave women with no political voice.

9.
Which source would best corroborate the claim that about 20,000 women signed the petitions?
Question 9 options
10.
Suppose that in 1843 a Massachusetts man wants Congress to end slavery in the District of Columbia, but under Rule 21 the House refuses to receive his petition. Which other way of taking part could change who decides whether the rule stays?
Question 10 options
11.
Was the right to petition worth fighting for from 1836 to 1844, even when the House refused to hear petitions about slavery? Make a claim, use evidence from the passage and the speech, and explain your reasoning.