OwlSheets
Tree Shade: Where Should the Budget Go? worksheet preview

WorksheetPremium

Tree Shade: Where Should the Budget Go?

Evaluate an argument about urban trees by examining evidence, assumptions, competing priorities, and the limits of proposed solutions.

Grade 7ELAInteractive · Printable

Aligned toRI.7.8

Buy this worksheet: $1.50

Or unlock every Premium worksheet with Premium

PrintUnlock to print
Answer keyUnlock to see answers
Assign to classUnlock to assign with a class code

What’s included

  • Single worksheet
  • Auto-graded online
  • 1 Common Core standard
  • Printable answer key
  • 13 questions
  • Classroom-ready

Details

Format
Interactive · Printable
Grade
Grade 7
Subject
ELA
Question types
Multiple choice, Matching, Circle the answer, Sorting, Short answer

About this worksheet

What students practice

  • Students trace how reasons and evidence support an argument about urban tree planting.
  • Students judge whether evidence is relevant and sufficient for specific claims.
  • Students identify unsupported assumptions and qualify conclusions to match the evidence.

How to use

Have students annotate the article's claims, evidence, and limitations before answering. Discuss how a relevant fact can still be insufficient to justify a decision.

Curriculum

Common Core standard covered

RI.7.8

Trace and evaluate an argument, judging whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence relevant and sufficient.

Preview

OwlSheets.com

Name Date

Tree Shade: Where Should the Budget Go?

Trace an argument and test the evidence behind its recommendations.

Read and Trace

Read the article. The neighborhood records describe a fictional planning example; the explanation of urban heat uses established facts.

Beyond the Planting Total

1A city announces funding for street trees, and the first question is how many it can plant. That number is easy to report. Yet a planting total cannot tell residents where relief from heat will reach them. The fictional Westmere planning committee should judge proposals by where useful shade will develop and whether trees can survive, rather than by tree counts alone.

2Urban heat islands form where built surfaces and limited vegetation help make an area warmer than nearby surroundings. Pavement and buildings absorb solar energy and release heat. Trees shade surfaces, and water evaporating from leaves can also cool the surroundings. However, a cooler patch of shaded pavement does not establish an equal decrease in neighborhood air temperature.

3Westmere's planning file includes a walking-route map, photographs of existing shade, and residents' comments. The map identifies an unshaded route between apartments and a public clinic. Residents describe waiting there in afternoon sun. These records help locate a need for shade, but the file contains no temperature measurements. They cannot establish how many degrees a planting plan would cool the neighborhood.

4One proposal emphasizes small trees because the budget could purchase more of them. Another favors fewer trees of a species expected to develop broader crowns at suitable sites. The committee should compare expected shade over time, not assume that either more trunks or larger young trees guarantees better results. Soil space, water, species, and maintenance influence survival and growth.

5A budget reviewer objects that money reserved for watering means fewer trees planted this year. That trade-off is real. But trees that die cannot provide future shade. A credible proposal therefore needs a maintenance plan and a realistic estimate of its cost. The file does not yet include local survival records or watering estimates, so it cannot settle how much money to reserve.

6Trees also take time to grow. At the exposed clinic waiting area, a shade structure could provide relief while new crowns develop. That does not make trees unnecessary; it makes timing part of the decision. Comparing the costs and expected shade of both approaches would be more useful than treating them as competing loyalties.

7Westmere should first identify heavily used places with little shade, then check planting conditions and long-term costs. It should track surviving trees and the shade they provide, not merely celebrate planting day. Such records would help judge the program's progress, although they would not by themselves prove a citywide reduction in air temperature.

1.
Which judgment about Westmere's planning file does the author support?
  • A. It establishes that tree planting will lower neighborhood air temperatures.
  • B. It establishes that the clinic route is hotter than every nearby street.
  • C. It helps identify an exposed location without measuring the cooling a plan would produce.
  • D. It helps determine maintenance costs without comparing different planting locations.
2.
Underline the sentence from paragraph 3 that most directly supports the distinction identified in question 1.

Westmere's planning file includes a walking-route map, photographs of existing shade, and residents' comments.The map identifies an unshaded route between apartments and a public clinic.Residents describe waiting there in afternoon sun.These records help locate a need for shade, but the file contains no temperature measurements.They cannot establish how many degrees a planting plan would cool the neighborhood.

The preview shows the first questions. Unlock the worksheet to see all of it.

Related worksheets