OwlSheets
A Better Model of the Heart? worksheet preview

Worksheet

A Better Model of the Heart?

Evaluate an argument about teaching how the heart pumps blood. Judge reasoning, evidence, and the limits of a classroom model.

Grade 7ELAInteractive · Printable

Aligned toRI.7.8

What’s included

  • Single worksheet
  • Auto-graded online
  • 1 Common Core standard
  • Printable answer key
  • 13 questions
  • Classroom-ready

Details

Format
Interactive · Printable
Grade
Grade 7
Subject
ELA
Question types
Multiple choice, Circle the answer, Short answer

About this worksheet

What students practice

  • Students trace an argument about using a model to explain how the heart pumps blood.
  • Students judge whether evidence is relevant and sufficient to support a claim.
  • Students identify gaps in reasoning and propose evidence that would strengthen an argument.

How to use

Have students read and annotate the proposal independently. Discuss the difference between relevant evidence and sufficient evidence before reviewing the written evaluations.

Curriculum

Common Core standard covered

RI.7.8

Trace and evaluate an argument, judging whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence relevant and sufficient.

Preview

OwlSheets.com

Name Date

A Better Model of the Heart?

Trace an argument and test the strength of its evidence.

Read the proposal

This original article presents a fictional school's proposal. Its classroom observations are invented; its explanations of the heart are factual.

More Than a Squeeze

1During a lesson about the human heart, students may squeeze a rubber ball to represent a heartbeat. The action captures something important: the heart is a muscle that contracts. But a ball cannot show where blood goes. Our science department should test a transparent pump with one-way valves alongside a labeled heart diagram, rather than rely on a squeeze ball alone.

2The heart has four chambers. Its right side pumps blood toward the lungs, where blood picks up oxygen and releases carbon dioxide. Blood returns to the left side, which pumps it to the rest of the body. The upper chambers receive blood, and the lower chambers pump it out. Valves help prevent backward flow as pressure changes during the heartbeat.

3In a transparent model, students can watch colored water move through tubing when a flexible chamber is squeezed. One-way valves direct the water forward. Unlike the rubber ball, the pump makes the direction of flow visible. Students could compare what happens when the chamber is squeezed and released. The colored water represents blood but does not reproduce blood's composition.

4A teacher tried the pump with one class after teaching the usual diagram lesson. Before the demonstration, nine of twenty-four students correctly explained how valves affect blood flow; afterward, nineteen did. Students answered the same question both times. The teacher also supplied an additional explanation during the demonstration. These results are encouraging, but they do not reveal whether the model, the explanation, or the repeated question caused the improvement.

5Another teacher reported that students requested extra turns operating the pump. That interest may help sustain attention, but it does not establish understanding. The model's bright blue tubing also matched the classroom bulletin board. Matching colors made the display look coordinated, but tells us nothing about what students learned.

6The pump has limits. A single flexible chamber does not represent the heart's four chambers or its coordinated contractions. Students could mistakenly imagine that the real heart has only one chamber. Teachers should therefore keep the diagram beside the pump and ask students to identify both useful similarities and important differences.

7Before purchasing pumps for every classroom, the department should compare similar classes taught the same content with and without the model. Both groups should answer new questions immediately afterward and again later. For now, the observations justify a small trial, not a claim that the pump is proven to improve learning.

Trace and evaluate

Use the article to answer each question. Distinguish what the evidence suggests from what it proves.

1.
Which statement best expresses the author's main recommendation?
  • A. Keep squeeze balls as the main tool for explaining blood flow.
  • B. Try a transparent pump with a diagram before expanding its use.
  • C. Purchase classroom pumps now and assess their usefulness after installation.
  • D. Replace labeled heart diagrams with pumps in the department's classrooms.
2.
Underline the sentence from paragraph 1 that directly states the recommendation identified in question 1.

During a lesson about the human heart, students may squeeze a rubber ball to represent a heartbeat.The action captures something important: the heart is a muscle that contracts.But a ball cannot show where blood goes.Our science department should test a transparent pump with one-way valves alongside a labeled heart diagram, rather than rely on a squeeze ball alone.

3.
Which reason does the author give for choosing a transparent pump rather than a squeeze ball to demonstrate blood flow?
  • A. The pump gives students practice measuring oxygen levels in blood.
  • B. The pump reproduces the coordinated action of all four heart chambers.
  • C. The pump allows students to study blood's chemical composition.
  • D. The pump lets students observe liquid moving in a particular direction.
4.
Which sentence from paragraph 3 most directly supports the reason identified in question 3?
  • A. “Students could compare what happens when the chamber is squeezed and released.”
  • B. “One-way valves direct the water forward.”
  • C. “Unlike the rubber ball, the pump makes the direction of flow visible.”
  • D. “The colored water represents blood but does not reproduce blood's composition.”
5.
How does the factual explanation in paragraph 2 contribute to the argument?
  • A. It compares learning results from several different classroom models.
  • B. It establishes the heart functions that the teaching tools must explain.
  • C. It explains why a diagram cannot represent the heart's chambers.
  • D. It proves that operating a pump improves students' long-term memory.
6.
Which evaluation of the classroom results in paragraph 4 is most reasonable?
  • A. They are irrelevant because written answers cannot reveal any understanding.
  • B. They are relevant because they measure understanding, but they do not isolate the pump's effect.
  • C. They are sufficient because the increase proves that the pump caused learning.
  • D. They are conclusive because every student correctly explained valves after the demonstration.
7.
A reader concludes, “The pump alone caused the improvement in paragraph 4.” Which detail most directly challenges that reasoning?
  • A. The teacher supplied an additional explanation during the demonstration.
  • B. The right side of the heart pumps blood toward the lungs.
  • C. The class contained twenty-four students when the teacher tried the pump.
  • D. The pump used a flexible chamber connected to transparent tubing.
8.
Which observation is least relevant to deciding whether the pump helps students understand the heart?
  • A. Students requested extra turns operating the classroom pump.
  • B. The pump's single chamber could create a mistaken impression.
  • C. The blue tubing matched the classroom bulletin board.
  • D. More students explained valve function after the demonstration.
9.
Why is the request for extra turns in paragraph 5 insufficient evidence of understanding?
  • A. It shows interest in an activity rather than accurate explanations.
  • B. It measures students' knowledge before they receive instruction.
  • C. It compares students who used the pump with students who did not.
  • D. It establishes that students prefer diagrams to physical models.
10.
How does paragraph 6 respond to a possible objection to using the pump?
  • A. It acknowledges a limitation and proposes a way to address it.
  • B. It treats student enthusiasm as proof that the limitation is minor.
  • C. It argues that understanding chamber structure is unnecessary.
  • D. It denies that simplified models can produce mistaken ideas.
11.
Why does the author propose asking new questions both immediately and later in paragraph 7?
  • A. To avoid comparing results from classes using different teaching tools.
  • B. To give the pump group more practice than the comparison group.
  • C. To replace explanations of blood flow with opinions about the pump.
  • D. To check whether students can apply and retain what they learned.
12.
Is the author's final recommendation reasonable given the available evidence? Evaluate the recommendation using one supporting detail and one limitation of the evidence.
13.
Suppose the department conducts the comparison proposed in paragraph 7. Describe one specific result that would strengthen the case for using the pump. Explain why that result would be stronger evidence than students requesting extra turns.

Related worksheets