OwlSheets
← Exit

Weathering Notes from the Cider Shed

0 / 15

Weathering Notes from the Cider Shed

Use field notes and model data to investigate how Earth materials change.

Read the harvest field notes

Read the notes about the old cider shed beside the orchard. Use the observations and data to answer the questions.

The Cider Shed Field Notes

During apple harvest, Talia's class studied an old stone path beside the cider shed. The path sloped toward a low garden bed. The students marked places they could observe safely and recorded what they saw after several days of changing weather. They did not touch the loose stones or enter the shed.

After two heavy rains, the class found a narrow groove in the soil along the lower edge of the path. Small soil clumps were in the garden bed below the groove. The class also saw that several loose pebbles had moved downhill. No pebbles were found uphill from their original marks.

Near the shed wall, a thin sandstone slab had a crack. In October, the crack was 2 millimeters wide. After six freeze-and-thaw cycles in December, the crack was 5 millimeters wide, and two small chips were beside the slab. The students used a ruler and took a photograph each time; they did not break the slab.

A dry north wind blew across a bare patch near the path. The class placed a tray 30 centimeters south of the patch and found 18 grams of dry soil in it after the afternoon. A second tray placed 30 centimeters north held 2 grams. The wind was blowing from north to south during the observation.

A plant root grew through a crack in a stone border around the garden bed. In spring, the crack was 3 millimeters wide. In late fall, it was 7 millimeters wide. The stone border and the root were photographed from the same place each time. The class then made simple models to compare agents.

For each model, students used the same kind of loose soil, the same tray size, and 120 grams of starting soil. They changed one condition at a time. In the water model, 40 milliliters of water flowed down each sloped tray. The bare-soil tray lost 22 grams; the tray covered with straw lost 9 grams. In the wind model, a fan blew across dry soil. The tray with a low screen lost 6 grams; the tray without a screen lost 19 grams. The measurements were made after one test for each model.

The class drew a word model for one possible change: water or wind acts on loose soil, soil particles move to a new place, and the moved particles may collect where the force is weaker. They drew a different model for a crack: water enters a rock crack, freezes and expands, and the crack can become wider after repeated cycles. These models were predictions to compare with observations, not pictures of hidden events.

1.
Which observation is strongest evidence that soil was eroded by moving water?
Question 1 options
2.

After the freeze-and-thaw cycles, how wide was the sandstone crack? millimeters

3.
Which explanation best fits the pebbles found downhill from the path?
Question 3 options
4.
Select the two details that made the water-model comparison fair.

5.
Why did the south tray collect more dry soil than the north tray in the wind observation?
Question 5 options
6.

How many more grams of soil did the bare-soil water tray lose than the straw-covered tray? grams

7.
Which statement best connects the sandstone observations with the word model?
Question 7 options

Use evidence to explain changes

Use the field notes, measurements, and word models. Choose the best answer, or write a claim supported by evidence.

8.
What does the change in the stone-border crack from spring to fall suggest?
Question 8 options
9.
Select the two claims supported by the model measurements.

10.
A student says, “The straw-covered tray lost less soil because it started with less soil.” Which detail challenges that explanation?
Question 10 options
11.
The class repeats the wind model with a new tray that has a low screen. Which prediction is best supported by the first test?
Question 11 options
12.
Which follow-up would give the clearest evidence about whether a growing root widens a stone crack?
Question 12 options
13.
Which statement correctly distinguishes the two changes in the field notes?
Question 13 options
14.
Make a claim about how the straw cover affected water erosion in the model. Support your claim with both water-model measurements and explain what the numbers show.
15.
Use two field observations to explain how more than one Earth-changing agent could change the cider-shed area over time. Include one example of rock or soil being changed and one example of material being moved.