OwlSheets
← Exit

Night Lights at the Zoo

0 / 13

Night Lights at the Zoo

Use evidence to judge plans for a nighttime courtyard.

1. What Changed?

Read the report and graph. Use this evidence to answer the questions.

The Courtyard Report

A zoo has a courtyard outside its insect house. Flowers there open at dusk. Wild moths visit the flowers to drink nectar. During some visits, moths carry pollen between flowers. This can help those plants make seeds.

The zoo added bright lamps for evening visitors. Before the lamps were added, staff counted 60 moth feeding visits over three evenings. Afterward, they counted 18 visits over three similar evenings. The flowers and their care had not changed. Staff wanted to investigate the lighting.

Staff tested three plans: open lamps with no covers, lamps with shields, and lamps turned off. The shields directed light down onto the walkway and kept much of it away from the flowers. Staff changed only the lighting plan. They kept the same flowers, watering, and counting spot. They counted feeding visits for 20 minutes after dusk on three mild, dry evenings for each plan. They counted visits, not separate moths. A moth could visit more than once. The graph shows each plan's total.

Tests happened while the courtyard was closed to visitors. For the courtyard to open, its walkway must stay lit. The chosen plan must also have at least 42 feeding visits in the three-evening test and cost no more than $50. Open lamps and lamps turned off each cost $0 extra. Shields cost $40. Both open lamps and shielded lamps kept the walkway lit.

Moth Feeding Visits in Three Evenings061218243036424854Open lampsShieldsLamps offLighting planFeeding visits
1.
Which change gave staff a reason to investigate the lamps?
Question 1 options
2.

How many more feeding visits did staff count with shields than with open lamps? more visits

3.
A student says, “The shields bar means exactly 48 different moths visited.” Why is this not supported?
Question 3 options
4.
Why might fewer moth feeding visits also matter to the courtyard plants?
Question 4 options

2. Compare the Solutions

Remember all three goals: a lit walkway, at least 42 feeding visits, and a cost of no more than $50.

5.
The lamps-off plan had the most feeding visits. Why does it still fail to meet the zoo's goals?
Question 5 options
6.
Other zoos report these test results. Sort each plan using this zoo's three goals.
7.
Select the two observations that are evidence about how lighting may affect moth feeding visits.

8.
Staff suggest a new test: add more flowers when testing shields, but keep fewer flowers when testing open lamps. What is the problem?
Question 8 options

3. Make and Check a Recommendation

Use the test results to judge claims and plan what to check next.

9.
Which claim stays within what the test results show?
Question 9 options
10.
Suppose the budget drops to $30. All other goals and plan costs stay the same. What should staff conclude about the three tested plans?
Question 10 options
11.
After installing shields, which two checks would help staff find out whether the plan keeps helping moths and keeps the walkway lit?

12.
A new lighting plan costs $30 and keeps the walkway lit. No one has counted feeding visits with it. What should staff do before deciding that it meets all three goals?
Question 12 options
13.
Use the original $50 budget. Recommend one of the three tested plans. Explain how it meets each goal, using numbers from the report and graph. Then name one thing staff should keep checking.