OwlSheets.com

Name Date

One Senate Seat, Two Arguments: Hiram Revels and Reconstruction

Read about Reconstruction in Mississippi, then corroborate two accounts of the 1870 debate over seating Senator Revels.

Answer Key

Reconstruction in Mississippi

Hiram Revels lived in Natchez, Mississippi, when he was chosen for the U.S. Senate. Read the passage. Then answer the questions.

From Natchez to the Senate, 1865–1877

1When the Civil War ended in 1865, about 4 million people who had been enslaved were free. The 13th Amendment, ratified in December 1865, abolished slavery in the United States, except as punishment for a crime. Freedom raised new questions. Would freedpeople be citizens? Could they vote? Who would hold power in the Southern states?

2At first, Mississippi and other Southern states passed laws called Black Codes, which limited where freedpeople could work, travel and rent land. Congress answered with new amendments. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, declared that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens and promised every person "the equal protection of the laws." The 15th Amendment, ratified in February 1870, barred states from denying the right to vote because of "race, color, or previous condition of servitude."

3Congress also required most former Confederate states to write new state constitutions that let Black men vote before their members could return to Congress. In 1869 Black and white voters in Mississippi elected a new legislature, and Black men won seats in it for the first time. The new government set up the state's first system of public schools open to all children, though Black and white students attended separate schools.

4In January 1870 the legislature chose Hiram Revels, a minister and teacher from Natchez, for the U.S. Senate. (Until 1913, state legislatures, not voters, chose U.S. senators.) Revels had been born free in Fayetteville, North Carolina, in 1827. During the war he had helped recruit Black soldiers for the Union army and served as a chaplain. When Revels arrived in Washington, some senators objected to swearing him in, and the Senate debated for three days.

5On February 25, 1870, the Senate voted 48 to 8 to seat him, and Revels became the first African American to serve in Congress. In 1871 he became the first president of Alcorn University, a new college for Black students. Another Natchez man, John R. Lynch, who had been born into slavery, became Speaker of the Mississippi House in 1872 and later served in Congress.

6These gains did not last. Groups such as the Ku Klux Klan used threats and violence to keep Black citizens from voting. Many Northern voters lost interest in Reconstruction, especially after an economic depression began in 1873. In 1875 Mississippi Democrats used intimidation at the polls to win back control of the state government. In 1877 President Rutherford B. Hayes ordered federal troops away from the last Southern statehouses they still guarded, and Reconstruction ended. Later Mississippi laws, such as poll taxes and reading tests, kept most Black citizens from voting for decades.

1.
Use paragraph 3. What do Mississippi's new public schools suggest about Reconstruction's achievements?
  • A. They offered schooling to adults who had been enslaved but not to children.
  • B. They ended the separation of Black and white students in Mississippi.
  • C. They replaced the schools that white children had attended before.
  • D. They opened new chances for Black children but kept some inequality.
2.
Which change made it possible for a Mississippi legislature with Black members to choose Revels in January 1870?
  • A. The Black Codes that Southern states passed after the war
  • B. The Dred Scott decision about who could be a citizen
  • C. The 15th Amendment, ratified just before the legislature met
  • D. Congress's rule that new state constitutions let Black men vote
3.
Revels and Lynch both came from Natchez. What does Lynch's career show that Revels's career alone does not?
  • A. State legislatures, not voters, chose U.S. senators at that time.
  • B. A man born into slavery could lead a state House within a few years.
  • C. A Black Mississippian could be chosen for the U.S. Senate.
  • D. Black leaders in Mississippi could start a new college for Black students.

Two accounts of the debate

Read the source note, the two accounts and the other evidence. Then answer the questions.

Source note: Reporters for the Congressional Globe, the official record of Congress, wrote down the senators' speeches during the February 1870 debate. The two accounts below are short, adapted summaries of the main arguments on each side, not the exact words of one speaker.

Account A: Adapted from arguments of senators who opposed seating Revels

The Constitution says that no person may be a senator who has not been a citizen of the United States for nine years. In the Dred Scott case of 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Black Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be citizens. Mr. Revels, then, could have become a citizen only when the Civil Rights Act of 1866 or the 14th Amendment of 1868 made him one. By that count he is a citizen now, but he has been one for four years at most, not nine. Besides, his papers were signed by an army general serving as Mississippi's governor, not by a governor the people elected. We must follow the Constitution, whatever our feelings about the man.

Account B: Adapted from arguments of senators who supported seating Revels, including Charles Sumner of Massachusetts

Mr. Revels was born on American soil and has lived here all his life. The Dred Scott decision was wrong when it was made, and the war and the 14th Amendment have swept it away. The amendment did not make Black Americans citizens starting in 1868; it declares that all persons born here are citizens, as they always should have been. By that measure Mr. Revels has been a citizen far longer than the nine years the Constitution requires. Mississippi has met every condition Congress set for its return, and its legislature has chosen him. The time for argument has passed.

Other evidence. U.S. Constitution, Article I: a senator must have "been nine Years a Citizen of the United States." 14th Amendment (1868): "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Senate vote, February 25, 1870: 48 to seat Revels, 8 against.
4.
Use Account A and the passage.

If Revels became a citizen only when the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, he had been a citizen for 2 years when the Senate voted in 1870.

5.
On which point do the two accounts most clearly disagree?
  • A. Whether Revels had been a citizen for nine years
  • B. Whether the Supreme Court decided the Dred Scott case in 1857
  • C. Whether Mississippi's legislature had chosen Revels
  • D. Whether the Constitution sets a nine-year citizenship rule for senators
6.
Use only the two accounts. Sort each claim: is it in both accounts, only Account A, or only Account B?
Revels is a citizen of the United States now.The Constitution sets a nine-year citizenship rule for senators.The Dred Scott ruling decides when Revels became a citizen.Revels's papers were signed by an army general.The 14th Amendment declares a citizenship that already existed.Mississippi has met Congress's conditions for its return.
Both accountsOnly Account AOnly Account B
Revels is a citizen of the United States now.
The Constitution sets a nine-year citizenship rule for senators.
The Dred Scott ruling decides when Revels became a citizen.
Revels's papers were signed by an army general.
The 14th Amendment declares a citizenship that already existed.
Mississippi has met Congress's conditions for its return.
7.
Use the source note. Why should a reader be careful about treating these accounts as exact quotations?
  • A. They come from a newspaper that was printed in Mississippi.
  • B. They were written by the same senator on both days.
  • C. They are short, adapted summaries of many speeches.
  • D. They were written by Revels himself many years later.
8.
Which piece of other evidence best corroborates Account B's reading of the 14th Amendment?
  • A. Article I says a senator must have been a citizen for nine years.
  • B. Its words say a senator must live in a state for nine years.
  • C. Its words say all persons born in the United States "are citizens."
  • D. The Senate voted 48 to 8 to seat Revels in February 1870.
9.
What does the Senate's 48 to 8 vote suggest about the debate?
  • A. Most senators accepted Account B's view of Revels's citizenship.
  • B. The vote was so close that a single senator decided the result.
  • C. The Senate seated Revels without hearing any arguments against him.
  • D. Most senators agreed that the Dred Scott ruling still applied.

Why the gains did not last

Use the whole page.

10.
The 15th Amendment was still part of the Constitution after 1877. Which detail from paragraph 6 best explains why few Black Mississippians could vote by the 1890s anyway?
  • A. An economic depression across the nation began in 1873.
  • B. Later state laws used poll taxes and reading tests to block voters.
  • C. Lynch became Speaker of the Mississippi House in 1872.
  • D. Revels became president of Alcorn University in 1871.
11.
Which account makes the stronger argument about whether Revels could take his seat? Make a claim, use evidence from both accounts and the other evidence, and explain your reasoning. Explain how the 14th Amendment affects the way Account A counts Revels's years as a citizen.

Account B makes the stronger argument. Both accounts agree the Constitution requires nine years of citizenship and that Revels is a citizen now, so the real question is when his citizenship began. Account A counts from 1866 or 1868 because of the Dred Scott decision, which gives at most four years. But the 14th Amendment says that all persons born in the United States "are citizens," and Revels was born in North Carolina in 1827, so under Account B's reading he had been a citizen his whole life, more than forty years. Account A depends on a ruling that the amendment was written to overturn. The Senate's 48 to 8 vote shows that most senators agreed with Account B. Account A's point about the papers signed by an army general is weaker, because Mississippi had met Congress's conditions and its elected legislature chose him.